Send your suggestions here





Reviews for Nikon D40x 10.2 Megapixel Digital SLR Camera Body Only

2.5" LCD - 3872 x 2592 Image - PictBridge - MPN: 25424

  • 4
  By member: d_bondi - May 5, 2008

Nikon D40x

Strengths: Takes Great Pictures in Auto Mode. I have large hands and it fits my hands well. Has lamp for autofocus instead of using flash.

Weakness: Requires use of AF lenses with focus motor IN THE LENS.

This is a great camera. We have a 3 year old and found that with our two Nikon point and shoot digital cameras, we missed many of the great shots. This was due to shutter lag and focusing issues. Since we got this camera, we have not had this problem at all. You turn it on and it is ready to take great pictures with no waiting. We also like the auto shutter that allows us to take many pics in a row. If you have young kids, you know exactly what I'm talking about here.

The weakness listed above is only because it limits the lenses. The two Nikon AF lenses we purchased work very well. Some even feel that the focus motor being in the lens is a plus. If the motor is in the body and it dies, then you can't take pictures with autofocus at all. If it happens with one of these lenses, just put on another lens.

100% of readers found this review helpful. Did you find it helpful or unhelpful?

Top
  • 4
  By member: kwahnoom - Dec 4, 2007

Great Camera to Purchase with a Prime Lens

Strengths: Amazing value and compares favorably to the main competitor in its class---Rebel XTi. D40x might feel small to those with larger hands, but Rebel XTi's construction feel cheap while D40x's does not.

Weakness: It does not have its own auto-focus motor. Thus the set of lenses that can be used with the camera and auto-focus is limited compared to Canon's Rebel XTi and to the more advanced D80.

This body-only D40x is obviously the same camera as the one that is included in the kit with either the 18-55mm zoom lens, the 18-135mm zoom lens or both. Thus, the same strengths and weaknesses that apply to the camera, as reviewed elsewhere, apply to this model as well. The key remaining question is why one should purchase a body-only camera as opposed to a camera kit, especially when one can purchase the cheapest kit for less than $100 more than the body-only camera.

The main reason is to redirect the money one would have spent on a kit towards purchasing a prime lens. In the recent months, there has been an active discussion on the web about the attractiveness of prime lenses compared to zoom lenses (e.g. vothphoto.com/spotligh...). After following that discussion for a while, I decided to purchase a body-only camera and get a prime lens separately. I bought a Nikon 50mm. Although it unfortunately does not auto-focus on D40x, it is the cheapest prime lens available (the next option is Sigma 30mm f/1.4 HSM, which does auto-focus). The combination of body-only D40x and Nikon's 50mm lens does end up costing more than the cheapest D40x kit, but it is a worthy way to enter into DSLR photography.

100% of readers found this review helpful. Did you find it helpful or unhelpful?

Top
  • 5
  By member: JayPii - Mar 8, 2008

Great Camera!

Strengths: Its light weight and easy to use! Most importantly its tough! The built of it feels more sturdy than most other competitive cameras

Weakness: There are not a lot of weaknesses, except for the fact that you need a Lens with a AF motor, the camera itself does not have one.

This camera is great, light weight and easy to use! Most importantly its tough! The built of it feels more sturdy than most other competitive cameras, I love the editing features it has, as well as the easy to use in-camera menu.

100% of readers found this review helpful. Did you find it helpful or unhelpful?

Top
  • 3.5
  cnet.com - May 7, 2007

Nikon D40x (body only)

THE GOOD: Comfortable, compact body design; very low noise at higher ISOs; highly customizable menus; 10.2-megapixel CCD sensor THE BAD: Slow kit lenses; RAW editing software costs extra; controls can be awkward; occasionally slow to focus; no automatic sensor cleaning; RAW-plus-JPEG mode limited to basic instead of fine JPEG compression THE BOTTOM LINE: The Nikon D40x makes a very nice first...

Read Full Review

Top
  • 4.0
  reviewgist.com - Dec 26, 2009

ReviewGist for Nikon D40 Body Only Digital Camera

Image is Good according to 76 Digital Camera experts. -- "excellent high ISO performance"-imaging-resource.com -- "6 megapixels will get you a very good 13x19 inch print; and since most people will only print 8.5x11 inch images max, that means you can heavily crop your images from the Nikon D40 and still get beautiful images on a Letter size page."-imaging-resource.com -- "the D40s image quality...

Read Full Review

Top
  • 4.2
  testseek.com - Mar 19, 2008

Nikon D40X

Testseek.com has collected 76 expert reviews for Nikon D40X and the average expert rating is 85 of 100. The average score reflects the expert community’s view on this product. Click below and use Testseek.com to see all ratings, product awards and conclusions.

Read Full Review

Top
  • 4.0
  photographyblog.com - Nov 7, 2007

Nikon D40x Review

Announced just four months after its predecessor, the Nikon D40x DSLR camera is virtually identical to the D40, except for one important factor - it has a 10.2 megapixel senor taken directly from the D80, rather than the 6 megapixels that the D40 offered. The sensor change means that the ISO range now starts at ISO 100, going all the way up to ISO 3200. The D40x also borrows the shutter mechanism...

Read Full Review

Top
  • 5.0
  Imaging Resource - Jun 29, 2007

Nikon D40x

Nikon's further reinforced their digital SLR battle strategy with the 10 megapixel Nikon D40x, a fine digital SLR that's family friendly. We actually thought the jump from 6 to 10 megapixels might introduce a flaw or two, but we found that the image quality was maintained or got even better in several key areas, including noise control at high ISO and overall dynamic range. As a result, indoor...

Read Full Review

Top
  • 4.0
  DCResource - Jun 1, 2007

DCRP Review: Nikon D40x

If you're ready to enter the world of digital SLRs, the Nikon D40x is a great way to do it. It offers a compact, portable body, great performance and photo quality, and a really user friendly interface. I wouldn't write off the original D40 either -- it offers the same features, just with fewer pixels and slightly weaker performance, for around $200 less. I would take a close look at the...

Read Full Review

Top
  • 4.0
  cameralabs.com - May 15, 2007

Camera Labs – Nikon D40x review

Ultimately if you’re a beginner who loved the D40 but wished it had higher resolution, then go for the D40x. If however you want a technically more sophisticated DSLR for roughly the same money, then the Canon 400D / XTi and Sony A100 have more going for them, although if you can stretch a little further, Nikon’s own D80 offers even more still. Indeed the D40x does a great job of up-selling...

Read Full Review

Top
  • 4.5
  letsgodigital.org - Mar 20, 2007

Nikon D40x

The Nikon D40x is handily compact, without losing its stability. It is perfect for taking along somewhere quickly and is ideal for day trips and holidays.

Read Full Review

Top
  • 3.5
  popphoto.com - Mar 1, 2007

Camera Test: Nikon D40x

The D40x has much of the same pre- and postproduction image adjustments as the D80, such as the Optimize Image menu of color/sharpness/contrast profiles, redeye fix, and D-Lighting to turn down excessive contrast. Drawbacks? The D40x has the lens limitation of the D40 -- only AF-S lenses (the type with built-in AF motors) will autofocus on the camera. For a first-time SLR buyer this is a...

Read Full Review

Top



All modifications published on this site are for your own responsibility.
TweakNews.net is not responsible in any way for damage caused.

© Copyright 2002-2012 : www.TweakNews.net