Send your suggestions here





Reviews for Samsung SyncMaster Black 2232GW 22\" Widescreen Monitor

22\", 1680x1050, 2ms, DVI - MPN: 2232GW

  • 5
  By member: Serj - Jun 15, 2008

One of the greatest LCD monitors I have ever seen

Strengths: 22" widescreen, 3000:1 contrast, 2ms, both DVI and VGA inputs, glossy finish, vivid colors, nice options to play around with (both on monitor and software)

Weakness: Price was a little high, but It is worth it

I was debating between the 226bw and the 2232gw when i saw them both in a local retail store, but the quality of the picture on the 2232gw was the obvious choice for me. The 226bw is sharper and grainy like most lcd monitors, yet the 2232gw has a glossy blur (just enough to look nice) which makes the colors much more vibrant. In my opinion anyone looking for an everyday computer use, go with the 226bw, but if you watch as many movies/shows on your PC as me, 2232gw is the obvious choice. (technically speaking the 2232gw is a 226bw panel with a different filter in front)

100% of readers found this review helpful. Did you find it helpful or unhelpful?

Top
  • 4.2
  TopTenREVIEWS.com - Jan 26, 2009

Samsung 2232 GW 22

Samsung 2232 GW 22 receives an overall TopTenREVIEWS score of 3.37 out of 4.00. It is ranked the #35 computer monitor of all time. The overall rating represents an intelligent balance of features, value as a function of price to features, and a summary of reviews from a variety of sources. The TopTen REVIEWS' formula gives a picture of important consumer features, market value, and a product's...

Read Full Review

Top
  • 3.9
  testseek.com - Oct 31, 2008

Samsung SyncMaster 2232GW

TestSeek.com has collected 7 expert reviews for Samsung SyncMaster 2232GW and the average expert rating is 78 of 100. The average score reflects the expert community’s view on this product. Click below and use TestSeek.com to find all ratings, product awards and conclusions.

Read Full Review

Top



All modifications published on this site are for your own responsibility.
TweakNews.net is not responsible in any way for damage caused.

© Copyright 2002-2012 : www.TweakNews.net